News & Legal Update

Analysis of Regulations about The Assignment of Export Rights of Crude Palm Oil

Image source: https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/hand-drawn-palm-oil-producing-industry- concept_12212034.htm#fromView=search&page=1&position=2&uuid=b142f23f-53cb- 4d22-9bf1-7165c9b2434e     From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law   Contributors: Ethania Surinitulo Duha, S.H., Poppy Putri Hidayani, S.H., L.L.M., Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H.   Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).       A. Background   Nowadays, of course we are familiar with the export-import mechanisms that are commonly used between countries. This certainly creates new challenges. One of them is the policy of transferring export rights. Is this allowed under Indonesian law? We need to look at the regulations, which is the object of transfer, namely Crude Palm Oil   (“CPO“). Of course, considering practice and field implementation, this becomes a new challenge and question. Can this be done? What do you need to pay attention to?   Legal Basis   Law Number 10  of  1995  concerning  Customs  jo.  Law  Number  17  of  2006 concerning Amendments to Law Number 10 of 1995 concerning Customs; (“Law No.17/2006“) Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade jo. Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law; (“Law No.7/2014“) Minister of Trade Regulation Number 19 of 2021 concerning Export Policy and Regulation jo. Minister of Trade Regulation Number 2 of 2022 concerning Amendments to Minister of Trade Regulation Number 19 of 2021 concerning Export Policy and Regulation jo. Minister of Trade Regulation Number 8 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Minister of Trade Regulation Number 19 of 2021 concerning Export Policy and Regulation jo. Minister of Trade Regulation Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Third Amendment to Minister of Trade Regulation Number 19 of 2021 concerning Export Policy and Regulation; (“Minister of Trade Regulation Number 19/2021“) Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50 of 2022 concerning Export Provisions for Crude Palm Oil, Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Oil, Refined, Bleached and Deodorized Palm Olein, and Used Cooking Oil. (“Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022“)   Based on the definition of export, it can be concluded that the activity of exporting goods can be carried out by anyone, both by business entities and individuals. The party carrying out the export activity can be called as the exporter. The definition of export can be seen in Article 1 number 16 of Law No.7/2014 and Article 1 number 14 of Law No.17/2006 which explains that:         Article 1 number 16 of Law No.7/2014:     “Export is the activity of removing goods from the Customs Area.”   Article 1 number 14 of Law No.17/2006:     “Export is the activity of removing goods from the customs area.”     There are several types of goods that require business licenses in the export sector issued by the Minister of Trade. One of a kind of goods that requires business licensing in the export sector to be exported abroad is CPO. As explained in Article 3 paragraph (1) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022 that:   Article 3 paragraph (1) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022:     “The export of CPO, RBDPO, RBDPL, and UCO as referred to Article 2 is carried out by Exporters who have obtained Business Licenses in the Export sector in the form of Export approvals.”   Export approval as referred to Article 3 paragraph (1) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022 is issued based on export rights, as explained in Article 4 paragraph (1) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022 that:   Article 4 paragraph (1) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022: “The issuance of Export approval as referred to Article 3 is based on Export Rights.” Getting to know more about export rights, the definition of export rights itself is contained in Article 1 number 13 of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022 which explains that:   Article 1 number 13 of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022:     “Export Rights are rights owned by business actors that are the basis for applying for   Export approval.”     So, business entities or individuals cannot export CPO if they do not have export rights. However, can the export rights be transferred to another entities? Then, how does it work? Based on Article 5 paragraph (1) and Article 5 paragraph (2) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022 explains that:   Article 5 paragraph (1) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022:   “Export rights as referred to Article 4 paragraph (2) letter a, letter b, and letter c can be transferred to other parties.”   Article 5 paragraph (2) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022:     “Export Rights Owners can apply for the transfer of Export Rights as referred to paragraph (1) electronically to the Director General through SINSW, by filling in the data electronically and uploading the requirements in the form of scans of the original documents of the cooperation contract.”   Looking at the provisions above, it can be seen that export rights can be transferred to another entities by submitting an application for transfer of export rights to the Director General of Foreign Trade through Sistem Indonesia National Single Window (“SINSW”). However, the transfer requires an agreement between the parties as a condition for the transfer of export rights.   If the application for transfer of export rights is approved, the Director General of Foreign Trade will submit the results through the electronic media SINSW. Then, the export rights that have been transferred are no longer transferable and can be used as the basis for issuing export approvals. Such as explained in Article 5 paragraph (6), paragraph (7), and paragraph (8) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022 that:   Article 5 paragraph (6) of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 50/2022:     “Based on the application as referred to paragraph (2), the Director General submits the results of the decision on the transfer of Export Rights in writing through electronic media to the National Single Window Institution to be a reference to SINSW in

Analysis of Regulations about The Assignment of Export Rights of Crude Palm Oil Read More »

REGULATORY ANALYSIS ON THE PROTECTION OF INDONESIAN MIGRANT WORKERS

From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law   Contributors: Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).   Background   Today, many Indonesian citizens (“WNI”) work abroad. This certainly raises new challenges, which unfortunately we often find, often Indonesian migrant workers who work abroad, get less good treatment from employers. Indonesian Migrant Workers are also found to be vulnerable victims who do not receive their rights in accordance with applicable regulations. One example that we can find is Indonesian Migrant Workers who work as crew members (“ABK”) on foreign-flagged ships, which do not receive their rights in accordance with the proper provisions, such as the security and safety of fishermen, a decent working environment, and also work contracts that are not well socialized. Thus giving rise to defects in the contract. One example is 19 crew members working in the Singapore Sea ‘tricked’ by the Employer (as the link attached). Therefore, to improve protection for ABK, Minister of Manpower Ida Fauziyah stated that the government is committed to fixing the issue of governance of placement and protection of Indonesian ABK (as the link attached­). But what about the Indonesian Migrant Workers who have been and are running now? Are existing regulations and regulations sufficient to provide protection for Indonesian Migrant Workers, and how are they implemented and monitored? Let’s look deeper into the Protection for Indonesian Migrant Workers below.   Legal Basis   The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 (“UUD 1945“). Law No. 18 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers (“Law No.18/2017“). Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law (“Law No.6/2023“). Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 90 of 2019 concerning the Indonesian Migrant Workers Protection Agency (“Perpres No.90/2019“). Regulation of the Minister of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia Number PM 59 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Business Service Related to Transportation in Waters (“PM No.59/2021“) Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2022 concerning the Placement and Protection of Migrant Commercial Vessel Crews and Migrant Fishing Vessel Crews (“PP No.22/2022“).   We need to know in advance what is meant by the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers by definition refers to Article 1 point 5 of Law No.18/2017 which reads:   “Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers is all efforts to protect the interests of prospective Indonesian Migrant Workers and/or Indonesian Migrant Workers and their families in realizing the guaranteed fulfillment of their rights in all activities before work, during work, and after work in legal, economic, and social aspects“.   As stated in Article 3 of Law No.18/2017 the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers  aims to ensure the fulfillment and enforcement of human rights as citizens and Indonesian Migrant Workers, and ensure the legal, economic, and social protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers and their families.   Indonesian Migrant Workers certainly also get some protection provided during work as stipulated in Article 21 of Law No.18/2017 which reads:   (1) “Protection During Work as referred to in Article 7 point b includes: data collection and registration by the Manpower Attaché or designated foreign service official; monitoring and evaluation of the Employer, employment, and working conditions; facilitation of the fulfillment of the rights of Indonesian Migrant Workers; facilitation of settlement of labor cases; provision of consular services; assistance, mediation, advocacy, and provision of legal assistance in the form of facilitation of advocate services by the Central Government and/or Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia and guardianship in accordance with local laws; coaching of Indonesian Migrant Workers; and facilitation of repatriation.   (2) Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers during work as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be carried out by not taking over the criminal and/or civil responsibility of Indonesian Migrant Workers and shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, laws of the destination country of placement, and international laws and customs“.   In contrast, the Protection of Migrant Workers who have completed their duties and no longer work has also been regulated in Article 24 of Law No. 18/2017 which reads:   (1) “Protection After Work as referred to in Article 7 point c includes: facilitation of return to the area of origin; settlement of unfulfilled rights of Indonesian Migrant Workers; facilitation of the management of Indonesian Migrant Workers who are sick and deceased; social rehabilitation and reintegration of Sosiai; and empowerment of Indonesian Migrant Workers and their families.   (2) Protection after employment as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be carried out by the Central Government together with the Regional Government”.   Based on this, Indonesian Migrant Workers who will work abroad have requirements that must be met as stated in Article 5 of Law No.18/2017, namely being at least 18 (eighteen) years old, having competence, being physically and mentally healthy, registered and having a Social Security membership number, and having the required complete documents. Not only that, Indonesian Migrant Workers also have the obligation to obey laws and regulations, both domestically and in the destination country of placement, respect the customs or customs that apply in the destination country of placement, obey and carry out their work in accordance with the Work Agreement, and report the arrival, whereabouts, and return of Indonesian Migrant Workers to the Representative of the Republic of Indonesia in the destination country of placement. As stated in Article 6 paragraph 2 of Law No.18/2017.   Related to the implementation of the placement of Indonesian Migrant Workers abroad consists of Agencies, Indonesian Migrant Worker Placement Companies or companies that place Indonesian Migrant Workers for the benefit of their own companies. The placement of Indonesian Migrant Workers by the Agency is carried out on the basis of a written agreement between the government and the government of the country Employer of Indonesian Migrant Workers or Employers incorporated in

REGULATORY ANALYSIS ON THE PROTECTION OF INDONESIAN MIGRANT WORKERS Read More »

Analysis of Government Cooperation Mechanism with Business Entities in Indonesia

From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).   Background   The role of the Government is very important for infrastructure development in Indonesia. However, the limitations of the State Budget in financing infrastructure development cause a funding gap that must be met. Based on the 2020-2024 Medium-Term Development Plan (“RPJMN“), Indonesia’s infrastructure financing needs are identified as reaching Rp6,445 trillion, while the Government’s ability to finance infrastructure needs is predicted to be only 37% of the total funds needed, which is Rp2,385 trillion. A total of Rp1,253 trillion or 21% was allocated from State-Owned Enterprises (“SOEs“), while Rp2,706 trillion or 42% of the total funds needed were allocated from the private sector (as the attached link). To get around this, the government uses various sources of funding, one of which is a development cooperation scheme involving private parties. This scheme is known as Public-Private Partnership (“PPP“). This scheme is a form of cooperation between the public sector (government) and the private sector (private) in providing public services bound by agreements that regulate the form of cooperation and risk sharing that has been widely exemplified in Indonesia. So how do regulations in Indonesia regulate the PPP scheme?   Legal Basis Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. (“Law 5/1999“) Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments. (“Law 1/2022“) Presidential Regulation Number 38 of 2015 concerning Government Cooperation with Business Entities in Infrastructure Provision. (“PERPRES 38/2015“)   Before diving further into the PPP mechanism, by definition PPP itself refers to Article 1 number 6 of PERPRES 38/2015 which regulates as follows: “Cooperation between Government and Business Entities, hereinafter referred to as PPP, is cooperation between the government and Business Entities in the Provision of Infrastructure for the public interest by referring to specifications that have been previously determined by the Minister/Head of Institution/Regional Head/State-Owned Enterprises/Regional-Owned Enterprises, which partially or fully use the resources of Business Entities by taking into account the risk sharing between the parties.” The purpose of PPP itself is regulated in Article 3 of PERPRES 38/2015 which reads: “PPP is carried out with the aim to: Sufficient sustainable funding needs in Infrastructure Provision through the deployment of private funds; Realizing the provision of quality, effective, efficient, targeted, and timely infrastructure; Creating an investment climate that encourages the participation of Business Entities in Infrastructure Provision based on sound business principles; Encourage the use of the principle of users paying for services received, or in certain cases considering the ability to pay users; and/or Provide certainty of return on investment of Business Entities in Infrastructure Provision through periodic payment mechanism by the government to Business Entities.” PPP has several principles, one of which is the Efficient principle, namely to cooperate with the private sector, which is regulated in Article 4 letter f of PERPRES 38/2015 which reads: “Efficient, namely cooperation in Infrastructure Provision to meet funding needs in a sustainable manner in Infrastructure Provision through private funding support.” Governments and private businesses can share risks and be accountable in purchasing power parity plans. Public infrastructure will be built by the government, while the role of private business entities is responsible for providing it and managing it within a predetermined period of time. That in PPP, the Government has a role to be the Person in Charge of Cooperation Projects (“PJPK”). In the implementation of PPP, those who act as PJPK are Ministers/Heads of Institutions/Regional Heads in accordance with the provisions in Article 6 paragraph (1) of PERPRES 38/2015. Not only the government, Article 8 of PERPRES 38/2015 stipulates that SOEs and/or Regional-Owned Enterprises (“BUMDs“) can also become PJPK, as long as they are regulated in sector laws and regulations. In infrastructure development, there are restrictions and what development projects can be done with the PPP scheme. The types of infrastructure and forms of cooperation that can be carried out with the PPP scheme are regulated in Article 5 of PERPRES 38/2015 which reads: “(1) The infrastructure that can be cooperated under this Presidential Regulation is economic infrastructure and social infrastructure. (2) Types of economic infrastructure and social infrastructure as referred to in paragraph (1) include: transport infrastructure; road infrastructure; water resources and irrigation infrastructure; drinking water infrastructure; centralized wastewater management system infrastructure; infrastructure of local wastewater management systems; waste management system infrastructure; telecommunications and informatics infrastructure; electricity infrastructure; oil and gas infrastructure and renewable energy; energy conservation infrastructure; infrastructure of urban facilities; infrastructure of educational facilities; infrastructure of sports facilities and infrastructure, as well as the arts; regional infrastructure; tourism infrastructure; health infrastructure; penitentiary infrastructure; and public housing infrastructure.   (3) PPP can be a Provision of Infrastructure which is a combination of 2 (two) or more types of infrastructure as referred to in paragraph (2). (4) In order to improve the feasibility of PPP and/or provide greater benefits to the community, PPP may include activities to provide commercial facilities. (5) Further provisions regarding other types of economic and social infrastructure shall be determined by the minister administering government affairs in the field of national development planning.” In implementing PPP, private business entities not only cooperate with the Central Government, but can also cooperate with Regional Governments. This provision is regulated in Article 167 paragraph (4) of Law 1/2022 which reads: “(4) Funding other than the Regional Budget as referred to in paragraph (2) may be in the form of cooperation with private parties, state-owned enterprises, BUMDs, and/or other Regional Governments.” Private business entities can also submit PPP Initiatives in advance to the government, in accordance with the provisions stipulated in Article 14 of PERPRES 28/2015 which reads: “(1) The Minister/Head of Institution/Regional Head initiates the Provision of Infrastructure which will be collaborated with Business Entities through the PPP scheme. (2) Exempted from the provisions in paragraph (1), a Business Entity may

Analysis of Government Cooperation Mechanism with Business Entities in Indonesia Read More »

Legal Protection of Malpractice Victims

Image Source : https://img.freepik.com/free-vector/hand-drawn-flat-design-infertility- illustration_232149367794.jpg?w=740&t=st=1696496630~exp=1696497230~hmac=ba5a4eb ad88825f4c47aba58903245f7cf6bd775c460628baeae9ed7012539f1   From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv)., Ricki Rachmad Aulia Nasution, S.H.     A.    Background Health services are very important as something that is needed by humans. In Indonesia, there are many malpractice acts where it is carried out by unscrupulous health workers and hospitals as service providers that can cause the death of a patient who is a victim of malpractice. Some time ago, there was an incident of malpractice that happened to a     7-year-old child with a brain stem death diagnosed after undergoing tonsil surgery at a hospital in Bekasi city, the victim of the malpractice could not be saved and has been declared dead, with the occurrence of the malpractice event the victim’s family reported parties related to the alleged malpractice that occurred to the Police of Metro Jaya Regional (The news link is attached as follows). With malpractice acts committed by health workers and related hospitals, it is necessary to have legal protection for victims and sanctions that can be given to related parties, so what regulations regulate sanctions for these malpractice acts and what kind of legal protection can be provided to victims? Let’s look at it further.   B.    Legal Basis Criminal Code (“KUHP“) Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 2nd Amendment (“1945 Constitution“) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (“UDHR 1948“) Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (“Law 8/1999“) Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims (“Law No.31/2014“) Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health (“Law 17/2023“)     Health services are used to meet health needs by providing health facilities periodically to the community. Basically, humans have basic rights to obtain health facilities as mentioned in Article 25 of UDHR 1948, which states: “Every human being has the right to a level of living adequate for the health and well- being of himself or his family, including the right to food, clothing, housing, health care, necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, illness, disability, widowhood, old age or other circumstances resulting in deprivation of income in circumstances beyond his control“.     With the existence of basic human rights that have been mentioned in the 1948 UDHR, in Indonesia there are also regulations that regulate the obligation of the state to give its people the right to get health which is seen as the basis for the application of Human Rights (“HAM“) which is contained in Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution after the 2nd amendment which states as follows: “Everyone has the right to live a prosperous life physically and mentally, to reside, and to get a good and healthy living environment and the right to health services“.     With the non-fulfillment of the right to health obtained by the people from the state, the community will experience illness and cause their activities in earning a living and livelihood will be hampered. Based on Article 4 paragraph (1) of Law No. 17/2023 mentions the specific rights obtained by the community which states as follows: “Everyone has the right: live a healthy life physically, mentally, and socially; obtain information and education on balanced and responsible health; get safe, quality, and affordable Health Services in order to realize the highest degree of Health; obtain health care in accordance with health service standards; obtaining alses over Health Resources; determine for yourself the Health Services needed by himself independently and responsibly; obtain a healthy environment for the achievement of health degrees; accept or refuse some or all of the relief measures that will be given to him after receiving and understanding the complete information about such measures; obtain the confidentiality of his/her personal Health data and information; obtain information about his/her health data, including actions and treatments he has received or will receive from Medical Personnel and/or Health Personnel; and get protection from health “   Therefore, everyone has the right to get their rights along with health facilities as provided by the state. The definition of health itself has been explained in Article 1 number (1) of Law No. 17/2023 which states as follows: “Health is a person’s state of health, whether physically, mentally, or socially and not simply free from disease to enable him to live a productive life.”     With the health rights that must be obtained by the community from health workers and hospitals who have obligations as stated in Article 5 number (1) of Law No. 17/2023 which states: “Everyone is obligated to: realize, maintain, and improve the highest possible public maintain and improve the degree of health for others for whom he is responsible; respect the rights of others in the pursuit of a healthy environment; adopt healthy living behaviors and respect the health rights of others; comply with outbreak or outbreak response activities; and     follow the health insurance program in the national social security”     Basically, if health workers and hospitals have been declared to take action against patients who are victims of malpractice. This needs to be a further concern. The victim himself according to Article 1 number (3) of Law No.31/2014, is defined as follows: “A victim is a person who experiences physical, mental, and/or economic loss resulting from a criminal act.”     With the definition of the victim above, that with the publication of the alleged malpractice committed to the victim of malpractice, it is stated that it was not done based on the will of the victim and also the victim’s family, therefore the victim has the right to sue and get legal protection from actions that have lost the life.     Victims of malpractice have the rights as mentioned in Article 5 paragraph (1) number (a) of Law

Legal Protection of Malpractice Victims Read More »

Separation of Social-Commerce Licenses After Minister of Trade Regulation Number 31 of 2023

From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv)., Abdurrahim, S.H.   A.    Background After the Covid-19 pandemic, people prefer to shop online through e-commerce. Shopping online is seen as more effective because there is no need to come to the store in person and the goods will be delivered to the buyer’s home. Electronic Commerce or e-commerce is all buying and selling activities or transactions carried out using       electronic media facilities that generally use the internet (as the link attached). But recently the social media universe is being enlivened by the prohibition of selling goods through TikTok Shop by the Government. TikTok Shop is a social-commerce platform, which is a combination of social media and e-commerce. Basically, when entering Indonesia, TikTok’s licensing is only for social media platforms and not for online trading platforms. The incessant sales on TikTok Shop have a huge impact on offline MSME sales which are declining, but of course it is also very helpful for many MSMEs who sell online. The government considers that social media platforms and buying and selling e-commerce should be separated. So how is the separation of permissions between social-commerce and e-commerce?   B.    Legal Basis Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. (“Law 5/1999“) Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer (“Law 8/1999“) Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. (“Law 11/2008“) Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning (“Law 7/2014“) Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 concerning Trading Through Electronic Systems. (“PP 80/2019“) Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 2023 concerning Business Licensing, Advertising, Coaching, and Supervision of Business Actors in Trading Through Electronic Systems. (“Minister of Trade Regulation 31/2023“).   The definition of Social-Commerce is regulated in Article 1 number 17 of Minister of Trade Regulation 31/2023 which reads: “Social-Commerce is a social media provider that provides certain features, menus, and/or facilities that allow Merchants to post offers for Goods and/or Services.”       By definition, electronic commerce itself refers to Article 1 number 24 of Law 7/2014 which regulates as follows: “Trading through Electronic Systems is Trading whose transactions are carried out through a series of electronic devices and procedures.”   Article 4 letter b of Law 11/2008 also explains the principles and objectives of electronic transactions as follows: “The utilization of Information Technology and Electronic Transactions is carried out with the aim to: develop trade and national economy in order to improve public welfare”     Furthermore, Law 7/2014 explains about trading through electronic systems as regulated in Article 65 of Law 7/2014: “(1) Every Business Actor who trades Goods and/or Services using an electronic system must provide complete and correct data and/or information. Every Business Actor is prohibited from trading Goods and/or Services using an electronic system that is not in accordance with the data and/or information as referred to in paragraph (1). The use of electronic systems as referred to in paragraph (1) must comply with the provisions stipulated in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law. Data and/or information as referred to in Subsection (1) shall at least contain: identity and legality of Business Actors as producers or Distribution Business Actors; technical requirements of the Goods offered; technical requirements or qualifications of the Services offered; prices and payment methods for Goods and/or Services; and how to deliver the In the event of a dispute related to a trade transaction through an electronic system, the person or business entity experiencing the dispute may resolve the dispute through the court or through other dispute resolution mechanisms.       Every Business Actor who trades Goods and/or Services using an electronic system that does not provide complete and correct data and/or information as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of license “   As for the implementation of trade through electronic systems, one of them is regulated in Article 15 PP 80/2019 , namely: “(1) Business actors must have a business license in conducting PMSE business activities. The Intermediary Facility Operator is exempted from the obligation to have a business license as referred to in paragraph (1) if: is not a beneficiary directly from the transaction; or not be directly involved in the contractual relationship of the parties conducting In order to make it easier for Business Actors to obtain a business license as referred to in paragraph (1), the application for a business license shall be carried out through an Electronic Integrated Business License in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations.”   Basically, the one of the problem in this case is that offline MSMEs such as those in Tanah Abang feel disadvantaged not because of the emergence of TikTok Shop, but because imported goods sold on TikTok Shop are considered much cheaper than prices in the market so that they succeed in attracting consumer buying interest. Stores on TikTok Shop will provide low prices at the beginning of their appearance to attract consumers, even allowing them to sell at a loss. The Minister of Trade, Mr. Zulkifli Hasan, explained that the significant price difference between offline stores and online stores is called predatory pricing which can damage market prices causing other traders to lose competitiveness (as the link attached). According to Article 20 of Law 5/1999 this is a market control that is prohibited by the following rules:       “Business actors are prohibited from supplying goods and or services by selling at a loss or setting very low prices with the intention of eliminating or shutting down the business of their competitors in the relevant market so that it can result in monopolistic practices and / or unfair business competition.” So that Article 13 Minister of Trade Regulation 31/2023 has regulated the following provisions: “(1). In carrying out PMSE

Separation of Social-Commerce Licenses After Minister of Trade Regulation Number 31 of 2023 Read More »

Racism in Football, How Regulations Respond to It?

  From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution, S.H., Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).   Background   Today in the general international world we see football matches, one of that occurs in Indonesia. In a match, of course, always have a “breath” of sportsmanship. But in practice in a match does not only involve tactical aspects and sportsmanship. Many “non-football” aspects often accompany the journey of football itself. One aspect that is grossly unjustified is racism. This may happen for a variety of reasons. One of them, sometimes there are some people in the name of bigotry to the team he supports and even harm others. Not infrequently, we hear news of booing football players who smell of racism. This is certainly an issue that as much as possible there must be clear mitigation. Most recently, this appeared in one of the teams in Indonesia. It should even be a further concern, that with the modern era like today, racist remarks do not only occur on the football field, but may also occur on social media players, or people related to football itself. Looking at this, how does our legal lens regulate related to this? Here we explain the legal point of view from the aspect of football sports and positive law of Indonesia.   Legal Basis   Asian Football Confederation Statutes 2022 (“AFC Statutes/2022″) Fédération Internationale de Football Association Statutes 2022 (“FIFA Statutes/2022“). Indonesian Criminal Code (“KUHP“). Disciplinary Code of the Indonesian Football Association in 2018. (“PSSI Code/2018“). Liga 1 in 2020 Regulations (“Liga 1/2020“). Statute of the Indonesian Football Association in 2019 concerning Neutrality and Non-Dissemination (“PSSI Statutes/2019“). Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions jo. Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (“Law 11/2008“). Law Number 40 of 2008 concerning the Elimination of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination (“Law 40/2008“).   Racism is common and familiar to our ears, but what is its definition? The definition of racism itself is known as racial and ethnic discrimination in Indonesian regulations, that is contained in Article 1 number (1) of Law 40/2008 that reads: “Racial and ethnic discrimination is any form of distinction, exclusion, restriction, or selection based on race and ethnicity, resulting in the revocation or reduction of recognition, acquisition, or exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms in an equal manner in the civil, political, economic, social, and cultural spheres.”   So in general, what is the legal protection for victims of racism? That it has been explained in the regulation on the elimination of racial and ethnic discrimination regarding the right of a person to make a claim for compensation contained in the provisions stipulated in Article 13 of Law 40/2008 and reads as follows: “Everyone has the right to file a claim for damages through the district court for acts of racial and ethnic discrimination that harm him.”   Not only that, there are further criminal provisions contained in Chapter VIII, that includes Article 15-Article 21 of Law 40/2008, that contains the highest sanction provisions for a maximum of 5 (five) years and/or a maximum fine of Rp500,000,000.00 (five hundred million rupiah). This is also known to have been stated in the KUHP, where it has been stated in Article 244 of the KUHP that reads: “Any person who makes distinctions, exceptions, restrictions, or elections based on race and ethnicity that results in the revocation or reduction of recognition, acquisition or exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms in an equality in the civil, political, economic, social, and cultural fields, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than 1 (one) year or a maximum fine of category III.”   The following are regulations based on Indonesia’s positive law, so how do regulations in the world of football regulate this? So we may look deeper into the regulations issued by the main of Indonesian football, namely the Indonesian Football Association (“PSSI”) where there are regulations that regulate racism that occurs when the match is held, that is contained in the provisions of Article 51 Liga 1/2020 that reads: “Things that disrupt the course of the match such as flares, fireworks, smoke bombs, banners that read and / or display racist images, yelling and other things that are racist, discriminatory or political that may be categorized as a disciplinary violation and against that will be subject to sanctions in accordance with the PSSI Disciplinary Code”.   Discriminatory actions that occur can occur during the match, where there are sanctions given in accordance with the provisions of Article 60 in the PSSI Code/2018 that reads: “1. Players or Officials who commit acts that are discriminatory in nature against others by using insulting, disparaging or demeaning words or actions related to color, language, religion, ethnicity or ethnicity or commit other acts that may be considered discriminatory shall be sanctioned as follows: Suspension for at least 5 (five) matches; and Sanctions prohibiting entering the stadium for at least 1 (one) match and fines of at least Rp. 300.000.000,- (three hundred million rupiah) if done by Players or Rp. 450.000.000,- (four hundred fifty million rupiah) if done by officials, that will be borne by the club. “2. If spectators or groups of spectators (supporters) of certain clubs or bodies commit violations as stipulated in paragraph (1) above, whether by installing flags, banners, writings, attributes, choreos or the like during the match, regardless of the reason for weak supervision by the body or club supported by such spectator group, the body or club shall be sanctioned: a fine of at least Rp. 450.000.000,- (four hundred and fifty million rupiah); and If deemed necessary, taking into account factors such as consequences, repetition of actions, etc., the PSSI Disciplinary Committee or PSSI Appeal Committee may impose other sanctions, such as the closure of the entire stadium or partially,

Racism in Football, How Regulations Respond to It? Read More »

Mechanism that Needs to be Considered in the IPO Procedure in the Regulation

From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).   Background   Nowadays, there are many companies in practice that want to list their names for Initial Public Offering (“IPO“), that is one example such as, launching from the news “Multi Garam Utama (FOLK) Mau IPO, Incar Dana Publik Rp 60 M” (source: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20230720072955-17-455703/multi-garam utama–folk–mau-ipo-incar-dana-publik-rp-60-m), and also “IPO, Ingria Pratama Bidik Dana sebesar Rp 353, 9 Miliar” (source: https://economy.okezone.com/read/2023/07/20/278/2849194/ipo-ingria-pratama-bidik-dana-rp353-9-miliar), who will conduct their IPO as we know, the IPO system itself provides many benefits for companies if they conduct an IPO, but keep in mind the mechanism and procedure in registering a company to conduct an IPO is not that simple.  Of course, there are still many companies that want to IPO, but have not been able to meet the requirements and/ or mechanisms of their own IPO that are also regulated in various related regulations. So what are the mechanisms and conditions for companies that want to conduct an IPO?   Legal Basis   Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Market (“Law 8/1995“). Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (“Law 40/2007“). Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (“Law 4/2023“). Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 76/POJK.04/2017 concerning Public Offering by Shareholders (“POJK 76/POJK.04/2017“). Regulation of the Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 41/POJK.04/2020 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Public Offerings of Equity, Debt Securities, and/or Sukuk (“POJK 41/POJK.04/2020“).   Although we are familiar with hearing IPO, we need to know based on the IPO (Go Public) Guide from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (“IDX”), namely IPO means a solution from the capital market for companies to obtain funding through the offering of part of the company’s shares to the public or commonly called going public. It may also be interpreted as a public offering that means securities offering activities carried out by issuers to sell securities to the public based on the procedures regulated in the Law on the Capital Market and it is implementing regulations, that we may find listed in Article 1 paragraph (1) POJK 41/POJK.04/2020. This process also makes the company transform from a closed company to a public company that will be managed better, more professionally and transparently.   In terms of practice, the IPO mechanism involves several other agencies besides the IDX, and has its own interrelationships. The implementation of these regulations is also more or less found in institutions such as the Financial Services Authority (“OJK”) and the Capital Market Supervisory Agency (“Bapepam“).   Then in carrying out the IPO process there are several requirements and procedurals that must be met first. In the provisions of POJK 76/POJK.04/2017 Article 1 paragraph 3, that there are provisions for the definition of the number of shares in becoming a public company, that reads:   “A Public Company is a company whose shares have been owned by at least 300 (three hundred) shareholders and have a paid-up capital of at least IDR 3,000,000,000.00 (three billion rupiah) or a number of shareholders and paid-up capital determined by Government Regulation“.   And it has also been regulated in Law 40/2007 Article 1 number 8:   “A Public Company is a Company that meets the criteria for the number of shareholders and paid-up capital in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations in the field of capital market“.   So what is the mechanism? in terms of procedures for submitting IPO registration statements, it has been regulated as follows:   “In conducting a public offering, it is mandatory to submit a registration statement to the OJK by submitting documents, namely a cover letter for the registration statement and prospectus. Shareholders or public companies are responsible for the completeness of the registration statement documents registered with OJK. Shareholders or public companies can make an initial offer since the registration statement is submitted to OJK. In making an initial offer, the registration statement letter must contain all information in the prospectus submitted to OJK. Announce the prospectus of a public offering of shares owned by issuers or public companies since submitting a registration statement to OJK with proof of announcement that must be submitted to OJK no later than the end of the 2nd (second) working day after the announcement. If there is improvement or additional information in the prospectus, the issuer or public company must announce no later than 2 (two) working days from the effective registration statement to OJK. A public offering can only be made if the registration statement is effective on the basis of the lapse of 45 days from the date the registration statement is received by OJK and from the date of the last amendment submitted by the issuer or public company or requested by OJK. Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement and before the commencement of the public offering period, public companies are obliged to provide a prospectus. The public offering period is carried out within a period of no less than 3 working days. Submit a report on the results of a public offering by issuers or public companies to OJK no later than 10 (ten) working days. If the number of orders during the stock offering period exceeds the number of shares offered, shareholders who make a Public Offering in allotment must give priority to share orders made by shareholders of the issuer or existing public company. If there are remaining shares, the issuer or public company must make proportional allotment to bookers who are not shareholders of the issuer or public company. In the case of allotment of shares for a public offering by issuers or public companies, it must be completed no later than 2 (two) working days after the end of the public offering period. In the event that there is a refund for the share purchase order that

Mechanism that Needs to be Considered in the IPO Procedure in the Regulation Read More »

Marriage Regulations of Different Religions and Beliefs in Indonesia: An Analysis

From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution, S.H., Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).   Background   Marriage of different religions and beliefs in our country is certainly not new. This has become a practice that we often encounter in society for a long time. Of course, this reaps pros and cons from various walks of life. Various opinions and assumptions arise regarding marriage of different religions and beliefs, so how do Indonesian regulations respond to it? This needs to be reviewed both in terms of history and positive legal history that governs it.   Legal Basis Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. (“1945 Constitution“) Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. (“Law No. 1/1974“) Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration. (“Law No. 23/2006“) Regeling op de Gemengde Huwelijken. (“GHR“) Compilation of Islamic Law. (“KHI“) Supreme Court Circular Number 2 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Judges in Adjudicating Cases of Petition for Registration of Marriages Between People of Different Religions and Beliefs. (“SEMA No. 2/2023“)   In this dynamic of marriage of different religions and beliefs, we need to research and look at the history of regulation. Long before the issuance of Law No. 1/1974, marriages of different religions and beliefs had been regulated in Regeling op de Gemengde Huwelijken Koninklijk Besluit van 29 December 1896 No.23, Staatblad 1898 No. 158, issued by the Dutch Colonial Government. In GHR, it is explained about the Mixed Marriage Regulation with one of them referring to Article 7 paragraph (2) of GHR that reads:   “Differences in religion, class, population or origin cannot be an obstacle to marriage.”   Over time, the Indonesian government as a regulator enacted Law No. 1/1974, so with this, the provisions in the GHR were revoked and no longer valid as positive law in Indonesia. (as the link attached)   So what is the definition of marriage itself today? We may refer to Article 1 of Law No. 1/1974 that reads: “Marriage is the inner bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife with the aim of forming a happy and eternal family (household) based on the Supreme God.”   Furthermore, Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1/1974 stipulates as follows:   “(1) Marriage is valid, if it is performed according to the laws of each religion and belief.”   Regarding the prohibition of marriage, it may refer to Article 8 letter f of Law No. 1/1974 that reads:   “Marriage is prohibited between two persons who:   have a relationship that, by religion or other applicable regulations, is prohibited from marrying.“   Judging from the article above, Law No. 1/1974 has regulated the provisions for valid marriage, namely when it is in accordance with the laws of each religion and belief held by the prospective husband and wife, and also prohibits marriage that has been prohibited by their religion. Article 28B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution also explains as follows:   “(1) Everyone has the right to form a family and continue offspring through legal marriage.”   The diction “through legal marriage” means that a person has the right to have a family provided that the marriage is valid in the eyes of the law and religion.   In Indonesia’s positive law, there is no regulation that specifically regulates the prohibition of marriage of different religions and beliefs, so it may be said that there is still a legal vacuum and uncertainty. Regulation is only limited to returning these provisions to the religious law of each individual.   Let us take an example in the religion of Islam. In Islam, marriage of different religions and beliefs is not allowed and the law is haram, where if a Muslim marries a partner of different religions and beliefs, then the marriage is considered invalid in the eyes of the religion and also automatically in the eyes of the law, because the law returns the provision to the rules of their respective religions. Regarding the prohibition of marriage of different religions and beliefs in Islam has also been regulated in Article 40 letter c and Article 44 KHI that reads:   Article 40 letter c of the KHI: “It is forbidden to enter into a marriage between a man and a woman due to certain circumstances:   a woman who is not Muslim.”   Article 44 of the KHI: “A Muslim woman is forbidden to marry a man who is not Muslim.”   Then today, there is a dynamic in practice, namely in 2022, there is a court decision from the Surabaya District Court that grants marriage petition of different religions and beliefs between Muslim men and Christian women. Previously, the Surabaya District Court had also granted 17 (seventeen) marriage petition for different religions and beliefs (as the link attached).   In addition, the South Jakarta District Court also granted the petition for marriage of different religions and beliefs between Muslim and Catholic couples as registered in Case No. 53/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Sel, and granted permission for the petitioner to register his marriage at the Department of Population and Civil Registration (“Dukcapil“) of the South Jakarta Administration City (as the link attached). This then raises pros and cons in society.   However, over time, the Head of the Supreme Court has issued SEMA No. 2/2023 that regulates guidelines for judges in adjudicating the registration of marriage petition of different religions and beliefs that regulates as follows:   “To provide certainty and unity in the application of the law in adjudicating petition for registration of marriages between people of different religions and beliefs, judges must be guided by the following provisions:   A valid marriage is a marriage carried out according to the laws of each religion and belief, in accordance with Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 8 letter f of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.   The court does

Marriage Regulations of Different Religions and Beliefs in Indonesia: An Analysis Read More »

Difference between Bankruptcy and Liquidation based on Limited Liability Company Law No.40 of 2007 and Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment

From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).   Background In recent times, there have often been companies that cannot survive when they experience destruction and / or failure in running their business and business and then decide to carry out Liquidation and / or Bankruptcy for the company. However, as we know, to carry out Liquidation and Bankruptcy requires requirements and procedures that must be fulfilled first by the company. Then what kind of steps must be taken by the company to carry out Liquidation and also Bankruptcy and what is the difference between Liquidation and Bankruptcy?   Legal Basis Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (“UUPT“). Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment (“UUK-PKPU”). Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 272/PMk.05/2014 concerning the Implementation of Liquidation of Accounting Entities and Reporting Entities at State Ministries/Institutions (“Permenkeu No. 272/PMK.05/2014“). Indonesian Civil Code (“Civil Code“).   Before diving further into the mechanism of bankruptcy and liquidation, by definition bankruptcy itself refers to Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Law that reads “Insolvency is a general confiscation of all assets of the Insolvent Debtor whose management and settlement is carried out by the Curator under the supervision of the Supervising Judge as stipulated in this Law.” And also the definition of liquidation, namely  the act of settling all assets and liabilities as a result of the termination / dissolution of accounting entities and / or reporting entities at state ministries / institutions, referring to Permenkeu No.272/PMK.05/2014.   Based on the results of our research there is a difference between liquidation and bankruptcy, it includes regulations, conditions, legal consequences, authorities and others. So what are the differences? Let’s look at the table below:   DIFFERENCE LIQUIDATION BANKRUPTCY Regulation UUPT UUK-PKPU   Condition Some conditions and mechanisms for the Liquidation process: –          Based on the decision of the GMS and based on the determination of the court; –          Companies that have been declared bankrupt are in a state of insolvency as stipulated in the Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations; or –          the revocation of the Company’s business license thus requiring the Company to liquidate in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations. –          must be followed by liquidation carried out by the liquidator or curator; –          The Company cannot take legal action, unless it is necessary to settle all the Company’s affairs in the context of liquidation. –          In the event that the dissolution occurs on the basis of a decision GMS, the period of establishment of that is stipulated in The articles of association have expired or are repealed bankruptcy based on a commercial court decision and GMS does not appoint liquidators, the Board of Directors acts as Liquidator. (Vide Article 142 paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the PT Law). That the conditions for the occurrence of the mechanism or process of Insolvency must be fulfilled 2 elements: –          There are 2 (two) or more creditors; –          There is 1 (one) debt that is due or due and collectible that is not paid by the debtor. “A debtor who has two or more Creditors and does not pay in full at least one debt that has fallen due and can be collected, is declared bankrupt by a decision of the Court, either on his own application or on the application of one or more of his creditors.” (Vide Article 2 paragraph (1) UUK-PKPU).   Application Procedure –          Announcing Indonesian newspapers and state news, (“BNRI”) followed by notifying the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (“Kemenkunham“) to be recorded in the company’s register that the company is in liquidation.   –          In the announcement of the newspaper and BNRI are required to add the phrase “in liquidation” in the newspaper that has been created on behalf of the company that will carry out the liquidation process.   –          The liquidator must also notify the Minister about the plan to distribute the liquidated assets by notifying by registered letter to the relevant Minister, the payment of the remaining liquidated assets to shareholders; and other actions that need to be taken in the implementation of wealth clearance.   –          After the expiration of 90 days of this second announcement, the liquidator can settle by selling assets that have previously been assessed with the services of an independent appraiser followed by distributing these assets to their creditors on the basis of pari passu pro rata parte.   –          Conduct GMS on the accountability of the liquidation process that has been carried out.   –          In the event that the GMS accepts accountability for the liquidation process that has been carried out, it is followed by an announcement to the newspaper that is then followed by a notification to the Minister that the liquidation process has ended.   –          In the event that the announcement has been made, the Minister will record the expiration of the company’s legal entity status and remove the company’s name from the list of companies followed by an announcement in the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia. (Vide Article 147 paragraph (1), Article 143 paragraph (2), Article 149 paragraph (1), Article 152 paragraph (1), Article 152 paragraph (3), Article 152 paragraph (5) j.o Article 152 paragraph (8) of the Law and Article 1131 jo.1132 of the Civil Code)   –          The application for bankruptcy declaration is submitted to the Commercial Court and those entitled to file it include creditors, debtors, Bank Indonesia, Minister of Finance, Capital Market Supervisory Agency and prosecutors in the public interest.   –          The application for bankruptcy statement that has been received by the court will be processed through an examination hearing and no later than the bankruptcy decision must be read 60 (sixty) days after the date of registration of the bankruptcy statement

Difference between Bankruptcy and Liquidation based on Limited Liability Company Law No.40 of 2007 and Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment Read More »

Legal Protection for Debtors When the Fiduciary Guarantee Object is Unilaterally Deprived by Creditors

From: A.M Oktarina Counsellors at Law Contributors: Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution, S.H., Pramudya Yudhatama, S.H., Raysha Alfira, S.H., Khaifa Muna Noer Uh’Dina, S.H., Putri Shaquila, S.H. Reviewer: Noverizky Tri Putra Pasaribu, S.H., L.L.M (Adv).   Background   Nowadays, there are many cases of misunderstanding between Creditors and Fiduciary Debtors, in that objects to the Fiduciary Guarantee Object are executed by Creditors unilaterally and arbitrarily without a determination from the Court. The execution of Fiduciary Guarantee cannot be done carelessly by Creditors because there must be a determination from the Court and also the existence of a Notary Deed and Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate against the object of guarantee that has been registered. So what are the legal remedies that may be taken by the Debtor and legal protection against the Debtor for the Fiduciary Guarantee Object executed by the Creditor unilaterally and arbitrarily?   Legal Basis Criminal Code (“KUHP“) Civil Code (“KUH Perdata“) Herziene Inlandsch Reglement (“HIR“) Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (“RBg“) Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee (“Law 42/1999“) Government Regulation Number 21 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Registration of Fiduciary Guarantees and Costs for Making Fiduciary Guarantee Deed (“PP 21/2015“) Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (“Constitutional Court Decision 18/PUU-XVII/2019“) Regulation of the Head of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2011 concerning Securing the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees. (“Perkapolri 8/2011“)   Before understanding further into the fiduciary mechanism, by definition fiduciary itself refers to Article 1 number 1 of Law 42/1999 that reads: “Fiduciary is the transfer of ownership rights of an object on the basis of trust provided that the object to which ownership rights are transferred remains in the possession of the owner of the object.” and Article 1 number 2 of Law 42/1999 that reads: “Fiduciary Guarantee is a security right to movable goods, both tangible and intangible, and immovable goods, especially buildings that cannot be encumbered with dependent rights as referred to in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Dependent Rights that remain in the control of the Fiduciary, as collateral for the repayment of certain debts, which gives the Fiduciary a preferred position over other creditors.” Judging from the two articles above, when the Creditor transfers property rights to the Debtor for Fiduciary Guarantee, the Fiduciary Guarantee Object is still in the hands of the Debtor for use. When the Debtor is deemed to have committed Default  in accordance with Article 1238 of the KUH Perdata for not carrying out its obligations in accordance with the principal agreement between the parties, the Creditor may execute the Fiduciary Guarantee Object. However, the execution cannot be carried out directly, and there are mechanisms that must be known, such as the following provisions. Referring to Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law 42/1999 that reads: “(1) The encumbrance of Objects with Fiduciary Guarantee is made by notarial deed in Indonesian and is a deed of Fiduciary Guarantee” Article 4 PP 21/2015 that reads: “The application for registration of Fiduciary Guarantee as referred to in Article 3 shall be submitted within a maximum period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of making the deed of Fiduciary Guarantee.” Article 11 paragraph (1) of Law 42/1999 that reads: “(1) Objects encumbered with Fiduciary Guarantees must be registered.” It may be explained, the fiduciary must be stated in the Notarial Deed and registered. The mechanism, after obtaining the deed of Fiduciary Guarantee, the object is registered with the Fiduciary Registration Office by the Creditor by attaching a statement of registration of Fiduciary Guarantee, after that according to Article 14 paragraph (1) of Law 42/1999 explains: “(1) The Fiduciary Registration Office issues and delivers to the Fiduciary a Certificate of Fiduciary Guarantee on the same date as the date of receipt of the application for registration.” The Fiduciary Guarantee is born if the Object of Fiduciary Guarantee has been registered and a Certificate of Fiduciary Guarantee has been issued. If the Fiduciary Guarantee Object has not been registered, the Creditor has no right to execute the Fiduciary Guarantee Object. This of course provides legal protection and legal certainty to the Debtor. In the event that the Creditor wishes to execute the Fiduciary Guarantee, it has several ways as stipulated in Article 29 paragraph of Law 42/1999 that reads: “(1) If the debtor or Fiduciary defaults, the execution of the Thing which is the object of the Fiduciary Guarantee may be carried out by: implementation of executory title as referred to in Article 15 paragraph (2) by the Fiduciary Beneficiary. sale of Objects that are the object of Fiduciary Guarantee on the Fiduciary Beneficiary’s own power through public auction and take repayment of his receivables from the proceeds of the sale; underhand sales made under the agreement of the Fiduciary Grantor and Beneficiary if in such a way the highest price in favor of the parties can be obtained. (2) The implementation of the sale as referred to in paragraph (1) point c shall be carried out after the lapse of 1 (one) month since notified in writing by the Grantor and or Fiduciary to the interested parties and announced in at least 2 (two) newspapers spread in the relevant area.” Then refer to Article 15 paragraphs (2) and (3) of Law 42/1999 that reads: “(2) The Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate as referred to in sub-article (1) shall have the same executory power as a court decision that has obtained permanent legal force. (3) If the debtor defaults, the Fiduciary Receiver shall have the right to sell the Thing which is the object of the Fiduciary Guarantee in his own discretion.” Referring to the two articles above, that has been published through the Constitutional Court Decision 18/PUU-XVII/2019, it is explained that Article  15 paragraph (2) of Law 42/1999 on the phrases “executory power” and “the same as a court decision” is contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 and has no binding legal force as long as it is not interpreted “For

Legal Protection for Debtors When the Fiduciary Guarantee Object is Unilaterally Deprived by Creditors Read More »